Sierra Club Home Page   Maryland outdoors  
       
Maryland Chapter     Explore, enjoy and protect the planet  
       
 
Chapter Home
Environmental Issues
Sign Up for e-Alerts
Take Action
Calendar
Local Groups
Get Outdoors
Politics and Elections
Legislative Priorities
Chesapeake Newsletter
Intern or Volunteer
History
Contacts
National Site
Join or Give
 

Catoctin Group

   Join the Club!     Sierra Store     Sierra Magazine    Other Sierra Stuff...
Banner 10000048   

Catoctin Group

The Maryland Chapter's Catoctin Group encompasses Carroll, Frederick and Washington counties in Maryland. The geography of the region and the area these counties cover offers a plethora of opportunities to explore nature.  But it presents a challenge to organizing our over 1,000 members, as it can take up to an hour to travel from Carroll and Washington counties to Frederick city, our historically central meeting place.

Carroll County

Carroll County lies in the Piedmont region of north-central Maryland between Baltimore and Frederick counties. Just under 456 square miles, it is about 27 miles in length and width at its greatest dimensions. Its elevations range from 300 feet above sea level in the southeast to 1,080 feet in the northeast. Home to forests, farms and wetlands, Carroll County sits in two major drainage basins: The Monocacy River to the west, which flows into the Potomac River, and the Patapsco or Gunpowder rivers to the east and south, all of which lead to the Cheasapeake Bay. Bear Branch and Piney Run nature centers and Morgan Run, a designated wild lands area, offer many recreational opportunities to the counties 168,541 of residents.

Frederick County

Bordered by the Potomac River and Pennsylvania, Frederick County is a transition county from the Piedmont in the east to the first ridges of the Appalachians and continuing west. Rolling hills of mostly farmland and small communities dominate the east. The county boasts a population of 220,000 residents. At the center is Frederick city, Maryland’s second largest city with about 59,000 inhabitants. To the west and north are the Catoctin Mountains, which are protected by Gambrill State Park, the Frederick Watershed, Cunningham Falls State Park and Catoctin Mountain National park. These parks offer numerous hiking trails, including the 28-mile Catoctin Trail, the longest in the region. Fifty-eight miles of the Monocacy River, nearly its entire length, is in Frederick County and is navigable when water levels are sufficient. The C&O Canal National Park parallels the Potomac River through the county, and the old C&O towpath has been preserved as a hiking and biking trail.

Washington County

The South Mountain ridgeline forms the border between Frederick and Washington counties. The Appalachian Trail winds its 40 miles through Maryland along this ridgeline.

Environmental Challenges

The greatest environmental challenges these counties face are population growth and suburban sprawl due to the spread east and north of the greater Baltimore and Washington metropolitan areas. As predominately agricultural counties, none have been designed for commuting: there is very little mass transit and planning processes have lacked vision. While there are many excellent recreational walking and biking trails, none were designed to be practical alternatives to driving. The water supply is also strained, and in some areas polluted, and the air pollution across the counties has been getting worse.

Catoctin Group Action and Activity

The Catoctin Group has been very active in working with and supporting other grass roots groups to help address these issues in an intelligent and environmentally sound way.

We organize a variety of informational gatherings throughout the year and recently launched Cool Cities campaigns in Carroll and Frederick counties. We are currently working to do more programs in Washington County..

Turn your interest into action

Currently, we are a five-member executive committee (excom) elected to two-year terms. However, we have lots of room to grow and would welcome more help.  If you live in Carroll, Frederick or Washington counties, please consider volunteering for a seat on the excom. We especially need people interested in chairing our conservation and political committees and putting out a newsletter. If this level of engagement is out of the question, but you’d like to get more involved, consider helping us organize a program, join the Cool Cities initiatives, lead a a hike or just join a hike or attend a film or social and get to know us.

For more information or to get involved, contact us!

We hope to hear from you soon.

Carroll County

Dan Andrews
Cool Cities Westminster
Energy issues/Chairman of Catoctin group
dooze@qis.net
410-857-4129

Gregor Becker
 Assistant Conservation chair/Political chair
lorax4@carr.org
410-346-6336

Frederick County

Ken Eidel
Treasurer
Cool Cities Frederick
kceidel@verizon.net
301-696-5933

Lew Sherman--Conservation Chair

Matthew Lindberg-Work--Database Coordinator

matthew@solomonsgap.com

 

Washington County

Marcia Watters
Water monitoring
mdwatters@juno.com
301-790-3808

 



Sierra Catoctin Group Calendar

MARYLAND SIERRA CLUB CATOCTIN CHAPTER EVENTS: / Winter/Spring 2010 -

Be sure to mark the date!!!  All are welcome to participate....

Future Executive Committee Meeting Dates:

 Saturday, Feb. 6th 2010 9:30 A.M.

 

Carroll County Public Library--Taneytown Branch

For Directions, Please go to the Carroll County Public library website!

http://www.carr.org

 In March, Community & Environmental Defense Services (CEDS) will hold a half-day workshop in Annapolis, MD on Making Pollution Laws Work: The Shortest Route To Cleaner Water.  The workshop focuses on proven methods to identify and quickly correct a variety of water pollution problems.  Techniques will also be presented for greatly expanding the political influence clean water advocates have among elected officials and other decision-makers.  Participants will learn how to turn their heightened influence into better compliance and improved aquatic resource protection programs.  To register for the workshop visit: ceds.org/compliance then click Annapolis, MD Workshop Registration at the top of the left-hand column.  There is a $25 per person registration fee.  For further detail contact CEDS at 1-800-773-4571 or Help@ceds.org.

The following specific topics will be covered during the first half of the workshop...

  • Why Pollution Laws Don’t Work Without Very Active Public Involvement;
  • Inventorying a Watershed for Pollution Sources;
  • How to Report a Pollution Problem So it Quickly Gets Fixed;
  • What to Do When a Report Doesn’t Result in Compliance;
  • Expanding Your Influence Among Elected Officials, Other Decision-Makers & Enforcement Agencies;
  • Using the Momentum from Issue-Oriented Campaigns to Elect Responsible Candidates to Office;
  • Providing Good Elected Officials with the Ongoing Support Needed to Institute Effective Watershed Management Programs;
  • Managing Watershed Growth to Preserve & Enhance Aquatic Resource Health;
  • Construction Site Erosion & Sediment Control;
  • Stormwater Management, Low-Impact Development, Environmentally Sensitive Design, etc.;
  • Wetland Impacts & Other Habitat Loss;
  • Point Source Discharges;
  • Combined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs);
  • Agriculture (Other Then CAFOs);
  • Logging & Timber Harvesting; and
  • other topics requested by participants.

The second half will be devoted to case-studies of pollution problems of concern to workshop participants.

--

Richard D. Klein
Community & Environmental Defense Services
811 Crystal Palace Court
Owings Mills, Maryland 21117
410-654-3021
410-654-3028 Fax
443-421-5964 Mobile
Web Page: www.ceds.org/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Proposed Policy on Unconventional Natural Gas 

Natural Gas Fracturing Task Force: Proposed Policy Language

The Natural Gas Fracturing Task Force has revised the original proposed policy in responses to the many comments. These documents will be considered by the Board on its Dec. 21 call. You can find the original policy and background below.

[ revised proposed policy (doc) | report to board (doc) | compilation of comments (doc) ]

BACKGROUND

Unconventional gas is increasingly replacing domestic conventional gas resources in the United States.

Unconventional domestic gas supplies include coalbed methane as well as gases produced from ‘tight’ sandstones and gas shales.  Gas from shales and tight sandstones (referred to collectively as “deep shale gas”) has potential to displace more destructive fuels when produced using rigorous best management practices.  Deep shale gas is not an acceptable transitional fuel unless its production is governed by a rigorous and comprehensive regulatory structure, and is done according to best practices that minimize environmental damage.

At present, deep shale gas operations seldom follow such standards.  Many states lack the treatment capacity to manage wastewater associated with the hydraulic fracturing (“frac’ing”) process and the permitting and enforcement staff to oversee production.  Sierra Club cannot support development of deep shale gas without a rigorous regulatory structure in place.

POLICY

All natural gas production, including deep shale gas, should be governed by a robust and effective regulatory structure; all gas should be produced using rigorous best management practices to limit environmental damage.

The Club opposes all coalbed methane extraction because it poses unacceptable risks to water quality in shallow aquifers.  The following provisions apply to deep shale gas:

First, the Sierra Club opposes frac’ing projects if the identity and volume of frac’ing fluids are not fully disclosed to the public. 

Second, the Club opposes any projects using frac’ing fluids that pose unacceptable toxic risks, including fluids which contain benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene. 

Third, the Club opposes any projects that do not properly treat, manage, and account for frac’ing fluids, drilling muds, and produced water. Frac’ing should not be permitted unless it can be demonstrated that drinking water acquifers and surface waters are adequately protected from contamination.

Fourth, the Club opposes frac’ing projects that would endanger water supplies or critical watersheds, that would seriously damage important wildland resources, significantly increase habitat fragmentation, that would imperil human health, or that would otherwise violate the Club’s land conservation policies. 

Fifth, the Club opposes any frac’ing projects that would cause violations of air quality standards, individually or cumulatively.

Finally, as the industry matures, a series of best management practices will emerge, some already identified, some evolving with time.  These best management practices should, to the maximum extent possible, be swiftly incorporated into regulatory requirements as they are developed.  The Club opposes any unconventional or conventional drilling projects that do not comply with best management practices, even in regions where state or federal law may permit lower standards of environmental management.

The Club will use these standards as a yardstick for any regulatory reform efforts it undertakes or supports, and to judge which new drilling projects, if any, cause unacceptable environmental damage and warrant opposition.


 




--
Alana Wase
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club
Conservation Program Coordinator
7338 Baltimore Ave, Suite 101A
College Park, MD 20740
Office: 301-277-7111
Fax: 301-277-6699
Cell: 410-960-7989
alana.wase@mdsierra.org

 

Did you know … ?

             The Catoctin Group has a local office in the heart of downtown Frederick.  Located in historic Kemp Hall in the historic district of Frederick City, the office is at 4 East Church Street.

The office is intended to be a resource for anyone interested in getting more information about local and national environmental issues.  There you will also be able to find out how you can become more involved with the Catoctin Group, and the actions and issues the Group is involved in; you can learn more about: Cool Cities, the recent Frederick City annexations, the proposed Frederick County Waste to Energy incinerator (and why the Club opposes it), the PATH and MAPP power line controversy, and a number of other issues the Group is working on. 

We would love for the office to become a resource of environmental information with books, publications, periodicals, pamphlets, and other resource material for use as reference and education.  We try to staff the office for a few hours 2 or 3 days a week, but that is not always possible.  We’d like to be able to have someone working in the office on a regular basis 3 or 4 days a week.

But, in order to do all this, we need your help.  We need some volunteers to help out in the following areas:

ü  If you have computer networking skills, we need you to help us set up a wireless network so we can share technical resources with other groups in the building.

ü  We need office equipment and supplies including a book case, chairs, files and folders.

ü  Please consider donating magazines, periodicals, books that relate to environmental issues (or not).  Your read copies of The Economist, Mother Jones, National Wildlife Federation, or other publications would be greatly appreciated.

ü  We are putting together a new display board for our tabling and other events; your creative and craft skills would be of immeasurable help

ü  Help with community organizing, database work, telephoning, gathering petition signatures, and other community actions

Or just stop by

meet Catoctin Group volunteers

see our office space

find out what issues your local Sierra Club Group is working on

 

I look forward to meeting all of the Sierra Club Catoctin Group members!

 MARK YOUR CALENDARS!

 The Waste Not Expo in Frederick will be held on May 1st  2010!

http://www.wastenotfrederick.org/

The Maryland Heartland Sustainable Living Fair will be held on May 22, 2010 at the Carroll County Farm Museum!

Please come and learn about all kinds of different green, sustainable practices!

 http://www.sustainablelivingmd.org/

The link to the Order of the Earth web site and news letter is: www.theorderoftheearth.com
The Catoctin Group supports the work of Pennsylvania anti-global warming activist Iona Conner with a subscription to The Order of The Earth
 
See the article Report From Copenhagen by Virginia Sierra Club member Glen Besa in the current issue.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
it speaks to the solution...
 
sea change in how we do things
                how we think
SIERRA CLUB, Catoctin Group FOR OUR FAMILIES,
FOR OUR FUTURE
January 2010 
   

 

 

 

 

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

BE SURE TO MARK YOUR CALENDARS!

Thanks to all of those who attended this weekend's Sierra Club Jamboree in Crownsville, Maryland-- Camp Barrett!

 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Check this website out!

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/09/hoarding-as-an-art-form-song-dong-waste-not.php

NEWS FROM GREGOR BECKER:
 
 
The upcoming Frederick City elections will lead us into a period of economic challenges for successful candidates who support environmental initiatives.  The political committee of the non-partisan Sierra Club has completed reviewing responses from Frederick City candidates. We want to thank the candidates who responded and thereby gave us the opportunity to become familiar with their views. Additionally, we appreciate the postive environmental views of all respondents. As we narrowed down to finalists we strived to identify those candidates with exceptional environmental perspectives. The Catoctin Group and the Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club proudly endorse for Alderman Michael C. O'Connor and Karen Lewis Young and for Mayor Jason Judd.
 
Gregor Becker, political committee chair.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

A bad deal

     Fort Detrick occupies 1,200 acres, which is 10 percent of the land area of the entire City of Frederick. Of those 1,200 acres, 400 acres are in “Area B.” Area B is the site of numerous landfills, 43 of which were found in 1992 to be contaminated with TCE and PCE, two carcinogenic chemicals. In that same year, TCE contamination was discovered off-post in residential wells.

   In 2001, the Army commenced an interim removal action (IRA) at one of the landfill areas believed to be most contaminated. In 2003, vials containing live bacteria were discovered in the excavation. Some of the bacteria were identified as being human pathogens. (Picking up on our failure to justify the invasion of Iraq by the discovery of bioweapons there, The Guardian newspaper in England then ran a headline that read: “US Finds Evidence of WMDs at Last — Buried in a Field in Maryland.”)

   In 2003, The Frederick News-Post sent a reporter to speak to afflicted residents on Kemp Lane and others neighboring Area B. The result was a front-page story titled “Cancer Questions: Residents Point Finger at Detrick.”

   The discovery of live human germs at Area B led to the decision to curtail further “intrusive investigations” at the remaining landfill areas. Instead of a strategy of removal of hazardous waste, it was decided to implement “remedy in place.” That remedy amounts to the installation of landfill caps over the disposal areas. The Environmental Impact Statement for the new USAMRIID building at Detrick says that this remedy will be completed by September 2008. To date, the remedy has yet to be completed.  

   Last week, as a citizen member of the Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) which is entrusted with overseeing the “cleanup” of Area B, I was given a tour of progress being made with the landfill caps. During the tour, one of the fort’s environmental managers mentioned in passing that the City of Frederick wanted to run part of its “Christopher’s   Crossing” beltway across Area B. What?

   The geology of Area B is treacherous — full of unpredictable, underground limestone configurations. The Army has yet to even assess groundwater contamination, which finally compelled MDE, EPA and both of our senators all to insist on Area B being placed on the National Priority List as a Superfund (hazardous waste) site as of this past April.

   I have learned that the fort had a similar reaction to mine when in about 2000 the city initially inquired about a road across Area B. One thing that has changed since then is revealed in an Oct. 16, 2009 FNP article, “City gives Fort Detrick tax break on private utility plant,” in which we learn that the city just agreed to waive property taxes in the amount of about $40,000 per year for 10 years in response to a request by the fort’s commander, Judith Robinson. (My calculations indicate that the $40,000 figure is understated   , but this tax waiver will have to be further examined in a future column.)

   Tucked inside the article about the “tax break” is the following passage: “Robinson said ... the Army would [in turn] provide a property easement at no cost to the city for the eventual expansion of the Christopher’s Crossing road project.” No one from either Frederick or Fort Detrick has illuminated the fact that this apparent deal involves running a highway across Area B.  

National Sierra Club Climate Security Act:
 
Our two priorities are first, our education campaign to encourage people to
support the Obama Administration’s use of rules and regulations in the EPA
and other agencies to address climate change.  We call this C3 funded
campaign "the Big Picture." Using a very successful online petition and
massive phone call push we are asking Senators to urge President Obama to
create rules that regulate coal ash, mercury, mining, soot, smog, and
carbon pollution as quickly as possible.  Visit the Big Picture Campaign:
sierraclub.org/bigpicture

Our other campaign, also dependent on your hard work, focuses on passing
strong, comprehensive climate and energy legislation in Congress.  Earlier
this year, the U.S. House of Representatives took the first step toward
unleashing a true clean energy revolution by passing the American Clean
Energy and Security Act (ACES or Waxman/Markey).  Our attention is now on
the Senate, where our Senators have started discussing their version of the
bill and will begin voting in early fall.   We urge Senators to strengthen
this  bill and ensure that it: creates good, clean energy jobs; makes
polluters pay for the carbon pollution that causes global warming; and
provides assistance for energy costs.

We need your help to get people to say to their Senators, "Support a strong
clean energy and climate bill."  Visit the ACES homepage:
action.sierraclub.org/aces

As follow up from the call, we are creating a summary of these priorities
for chapter newsletters and websites.  Watch your newsletter feeds for
these materials and commit to create a groundswell of support for clean
energy and global warming priorities.  Sign up to become a Climate Leader
and invite ten friends to do the same: www.sierraclub.org/climateleaders

 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

 

http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/3642/


The Crying Indian
How an environmental icon helped sell cans -- and sell out environmentalism

Orion magazine
November/December 2008

BY GINGER STRAND

... Over two million Americans acted on that belief in 2006, volunteering for Keep America Beautiful activities: picking up litter, removing graffiti, painting buildings, and planting greenery. Many may not have realized they were handing their free time to a front group for the beer bottlers, can companies, and soda makers who crank out the containers that constitute half of America's litter. Or that this front group opposes the reuse and recycling legislation that might better address the problem. The information is not hard to find. Ted Williams wrote about it in 1990 for Audubon. Online, you can find many more narratives of KAB's real motives, including a summary by the Container Recycling Institute.

.... In 1953, Vermont's state legislature had a brain wave: beer companies start pollution, legislation can stop it. They passed a statute banning the sale of beer and ale in one-way bottles. It wasn't a deposit law—it declared that beer could only be sold in returnable, reusable bottles. Anchor-Hocking, a glass manufacturer, immediately filed suit, calling the law unconstitutional. The Vermont Supreme Court disagreed in May 1954, and the law took effect. That October, Keep America Beautiful was born, declaring its intention to "break Americans of the habit of tossing litter into streets and out of car windows." The New York Times noted that the group's leaders included "executives of concerns manufacturing beer, beer cans, bottles, soft drinks, chewing gum, candy, cigarettes and other products." These disciples of disposability, led by William C. Stolk, president of the American Can Company, set about changing the terms in the conversation about litter.

The packaging industry justifies disposables as a response to consumer demand: buyers wanted convenience; packagers simply provided it. But that's not exactly true. Consumers had to be trained to be wasteful. Part of this re-education involved forestalling any debate over the wisdom of creating disposables in the first place, replacing it with an emphasis on "proper" disposal. Keep America Beautiful led this refocusing on the symptoms rather than the system. The trouble was not their industry's promulgation of throwaway stuff; the trouble was those oafs who threw it away.

At the same time, the container industry lobbied hard behind the scenes. In 1957, with little fanfare, Vermont's senate caved to the pressure and declined to renew its reusable bottle law.

...In 1962, Michigan considered a ban on no-return bottles. Keep America Beautiful openly opposed it. Throughout the sixties, Keep America Beautiful and the Ad Council battled a growing demand for legislation with an increasing vilification of the individual. They spawned the slogan "Every litter bit hurts" and popularized the term "litterbug." In 1967, meeting at the Yale Club, they decided to go negative. "There seemed to be mutual agreement," wrote campaign coordinator David Hart, "that our 'soft sell' used in previous years could now be replaced by a more emphatic approach to the problem by saying that those who litter are 'slobs.'" The next year, planners upped the ante, calling litterers "pigs." The South Texas Pork Producers Council wrote in to complain.

...It was an elegantly closed circle. The titans of packaging pushed throwaways into production. The Ad Council preached the creed of consumption, assuring Americans that the road to prosperity was paved with trash. The people bought; the people threw away. Then, the same industries and advertisers turned around and called them pigs. The people shamefacedly cleaned up the trash. And the packagers, pointing to the cleaned-up landscape, just went on making more of it.

...Symbolic protest rarely is. In 1976, after KAB testified against a proposed California bottle deposit law, the EPA and seven environmental groups, including the Sierra Club and The Wilderness Society, resigned from its advisory board. Activists declared KAB a "front group." But by then, being outed didn't matter. The group's work was largely done. In 1976, two-thirds of America's soft drinks and nearly four-fifths of its beer came in disposables. Today, every American throws away about three hundred pounds of solid waste a year, about one-third of it packaging. Sixty percent of that comes from food and beverages.

Eleven states have succeeded in passing bottle bills. Beverage container recycling rates in those states are roughly double rates in nondeposit states. But in shifting the debate to bottle deposit legislation—which it opposed—KAB still won, because it shut down debate over whether disposable beverage containers were a good idea in the first place. Vermont's original 1953 law would have required manufacturers to accept and refill their empties. No one's talking about that now.

.....In 1960, the year Keep America Beautiful and the Ad Council joined forces, containers and packaging composed just over 7 percent of the U.S. aluminum market. But Harper's gamble paid off. Within twenty years, aluminum containers would produce more revenue for Alcoa than its second-, third-, and fourth-largest markets combined. John D. Harper spent much of that time as a member of the Ad Council's Industry Advisory Committee.

...Ironically, perhaps unwittingly, the Ad Council and Keep America Beautiful got it right. The crying Indian hints at the root cause of the problem he mourns: it's not just roadside trash. It's the culture of consumption that created that trash—with government subsidized power—and sold it to the public as the American Dream, when in fact it was that very dream's death. Iron Eyes Cody may have wept on cue, but George Gillette wept for the land.

IS THE CRYING INDIAN the root of environmentalism, as Wikipedia would have it? Or is he its sole mourner, weeping its silent dirge? In the thirty years following his debut, Americans landfilled or incinerated more than a trillion aluminum cans—enough to encircle the Earth 3,048 times.

 

 

 
SIERRA CLUB

EXPLORE, ENJOY AND PROTECT THE PLANET
 
   
QUICK LINK

 

Please read this article sent by Ken Eidel:

http://www.naturalpath.com/sustainability/eric-lombardis-zero-waste-park

Here is the link to the "Story of Stuff" http://www.storyofstuff.com/

Check it out!

 





Up to Top